Are there published studies that show similar or dissimilar trends that should be discussed? Or whether it is publishable in principle and merits a detailed, careful read through. Adams, Bastaki, Harman, McGowen, and Taylor researched and compiled available study data and assisted in the drafting of the manuscript. Also, they won't get feedback on how to improve their research and it could trigger an appeal. A decision requires further reviews. It will help you form an initial impression of the paper and get a sense of whether your eventual recommendation will be to accept or reject the paper. The domestication of O. lanceolata is hampered by erratic and unreliable supply of seeds. the CONSORT Statement for reporting randomized trials), The health and safety of all participants in the study was not compromised, They should start by describing in simple terms what the data show, They should make reference to statistical analyses, such as significance or goodness of fit, Once described, they should evaluate the trends observed and explain the significance of the results to wider understanding. Manuscripts is a free authoring tool designed specifically for authors of scientific articles. In most MDPI journals, peer-review is a single-blind assessment with at least two . Give positive feedback first. My field of research is IoT security and cryptography analysis. Watch the video, Ethical considerations of Peer Review, Step by Step Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript | Wiley, Wiley's Best Practice Guidelines on Publishing Ethics, Wiley Author Learning and Training Channel. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor's decision. A cover letter should accompany each submitted manuscript. All Rights Reserved. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Is the paper well written? Just very anxious!! Manuscript Types Type Abstract Length Format Tables/figu res/boxes Illustrations Useful reference Original Article Structured; up to words Up to 1500 words Up to 10 references, Vancouver Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? The Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (JPEN) is the premier scientific journal of clinical nutrition and metabolic support. Highlight important findings sufficiently? Authors are requested to update any pre-publication versions with a link to the final published article. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Wiley manuscript status under consideration. If the status does not change soon, you should send a status inquiry to the editorial office. The Earth's climate is changing rapidly (IPCC, 2013) and projections indicate that drought events will increase in frequency and severity in many regions of the world (Dai, 2013; Cook et al., 2014; Swann et al., 2016).Drought can have severe effects on ecosystems (Ciais et al., 2005) and can trigger regional-scale tree mortality events (Breshears et al., 2005; McDowell et al . A poor abstract can then lose the reader's interest and undo the benefit of an effective title - whilst the paper's abstract may appear in search results, the potential reader may go no further. [CDATA[// > But I think these are rare events. Currently there are several therapeutic agents in more than 1000 clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease . You may also choose to state whether you opt in or out of the post-revision review too. Of course, one cannot be sure, but I think your paper stands a fair chance of being sent for peer review. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. With some journals, editors are invited and not assigned. Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. TABLE 1. [CDATA[> It must confirm that all authors have read the manuscript, the paper has not been previously published, and it is not under simultaneous consideration by another journal. While reviews exist on aqueous Zn chemistries, a critical self-contained comparison of AZBs and MZIBs remains elusive. organization, and guidance of the workshop, and their review of this manuscript. "that it is not under consideration for publication . It is also important at this stage to declare any potential Conflict of Interest. If the paper includes tables or figures, what do they add to the paper? Either way, this is usually a good sign if it is at Nature itself. The average number of days from manuscript submission to the first appearance of the article online. Editorial Policies. So in the spirit of fairness, write comments to editors as though authors might read them too. 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 43:406-411, 2015. If there is a resource that is not found within the Portal, authors are asked to register the resource with the appropriate resource authority. The review process may take a few weeks or even months. Manuscripts is a free authoring tool designed specifically for authors of scientific articles. Results: The case-ascertainment models were derived and validated internally through bootstrapping on 5099 individuals from one center (33% moderate/severe OSA) and validated externally on 13,486 adults from the other (45% . Academic research should be replicable, repeatable and robust - and follow best practice. Asked by Ramkumar CB When a tree is evaluated that contains only a subset of the taxa in the reference tree, the identification of clades in the subset tree with clades from the reference tree presents a fundamental problem (Goloboff and Pol, 2002; Goloboff, 2005).Often, it is impossible to identify a clade from a partial analysis unequivocally with a single containing clade from the reference tree. Thank you Mr. Tong Wu for your generous advice. A study on the rooting of O. lanceolata stem cuttings was conducted using a low-cost technology employed in commercial rooting stem cuttings of tea . ]]> I have run into the same situation. Did you find it fair and transparent ? You may feel you can advise the author how to emphasize the novel aspects of their own study, so as to better differentiate it from similar research. Clearly, authors can only do this by referencing recent literature. on wiley manuscript status under consideration Posted in mama box wochenbett essen By Posted on June 2, 2022 on wiley manuscript status under consideration Posted in mama box wochenbett essen By Posted on June 2, 2022 7, 12, 16, 18, 20, 21, 25, 27 Ten of 17 studies had a comparison group versus infants under age 12 months. "Be clear in their comments to the author (or editor) which points are absolutely critical if the paper is given an opportunity for revision." This point is only valid if researchers can point to recent developments in data gathering techniques or to research in indirectly related fields that suggest the topic needs revisiting. Are all tables and figures appropriate, sufficient, and correctly labelled? , and 2 (0.8%) cases of infection. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Your review should ultimately help the author improve their article. Depending on the conservation objective, de-extinction outcomes range from maintaining viable seed or embryos in the freezer, through regenerating a few individuals to keep in captivity, to establishing self-sustaining populations in the wild in large .